Appropriation for City-owned property: 10 and 30 W Lake St

Appropriation for City-owned property: 10 and 30 W Lake St - REIA

Section 1: Background

Does this impact one of the City's Goal Areas

Policy Goals

Operational Goals

Public Safety	No
Housing	No
Economic Development	No
Public Services	Yes
Environmental Justice	No
Built Environment & Transportation	No
Public Health	No
Arts & Culture	No

Workforce	No
Spending	Yes
Data	No
Community Engagement	No

Describe the impact on selected goal areas.

The appropriation request impacst City spending goals on building demolition and property mangment services that will enable future redevelopment of the site.

Who participated in completing this analysis?

CPED staff

Section 2: Data

LIST THE SPECIFIC GEOGRAPHIES THAT WILL BE IMPACTED AND THE RACIAL DEMOGRAPHICS OF CONSTITUENTS IN THOSE AREAS:

The geography impacted most by the demolition and property management is the circular area approximately 1/4-mile from the property. The racial demographics of the residents within this area are approximately 49% African American or Black, 24% White/Not Hispanic, 23% Hispanic or Latinx, and 5% All other categories/More than one race.

The demographics of the geography in the rectangular area approximately 1/2-mile to the north, 1/2-mile to the south, 1/2-mile to the east, and 1/2-mile to the west are approximately 35% White/Not Hispanic, 30% African American or Black, 27% Hispanic or Latinx, and 8% All other categories/More than one race.

What does available data tell you about how constituents from BIPOC communities currently relate to the desired outcome as compared to white constituents?

The available data does not include information about constituents' desired outcomes.

What data is unavailable or missing? How can you obtain additional data?

CPED does not have data available at this time that relates directly to how residents of the area relate to the demolition of the vacant building at 30 W Lake St or property management of the two properties. The City does receive resident complaints about the upkeep of the building, and staff believe that demolishing the building will improve site security and general appearance.

Section 3: Community Engagement

Using the International Association of Public Participation (IAP2) Public Participation Spectrum, which participation strategy(s) was used when engaging those who would be most impacted?

Inform	Yes
Consult	Yes
Involve	Yes
Collaborate	Yes
Empower	No

Describe the Engagement and what have you learned?

The community will be informed of the demolition as it is implemented.

What we learned in the Phase I of community engagement was presented to the Business, Inspections, Zoning and Housing Committee of the City Council on May 2, 2023. https://lims.minneapolismn.gov/file/2023-00397

Section 4: Analysis

How does the outcome for this ordinance, amendment, or policy help the city achieve Racial Equity?

This action provides funding for the demolition of a vacant building and continued property management of City-owned parcels. Redevelopment of the site after demolition will provide many different types of opportunities for the City to help achieve racial equity.

Section 5: Evaluation

How will impacts be measured? What are the success indicators and process benchmarks?

Impacts from the demolition and continued property management will be measured by receiving fewer resident complaints about property upkeep.

How will those who are impacted be informed of progress over time?

Those impacted by the demolition and continued property management will be informed of progress on the City's website and through the related GovDelivery listserv.

Print Back to Home

Can you spare a minute?